FY 2024 WRE Ranking Criteria Questions - Rhode Island

FY 2024 RI WRE General Ranking Criteria Questions 

Section: Applicability Questions

1. Did an eligible entity apply for ACEP WRE? 
   1. Yes — Points: 0
   2. No — Points: 0

Section: Category Questions

1. Is the application in the State of Rhode Island?
   1. Yes — Points: 0
   2. No — Points: 0

Section: Program Questions

1. Review of easement value per acre:
   1. Less than $2500 per acre — Points: 15
   2. Between $2500-5000 per acre — Points: 10
   3. Greater than $5000 per acre — Points: 0
2. Will the land landowner, partners or contributing entity contribute funds to purchase the easements?
   1. Landowner or entity has offered to contribute to costs — Points: 2
   2. Landowner or entity has NOT offered to contribute to costs — Points: 0
3. Will the be purchased Fee Simple by a land protection organization such as RIDEM, local land trust or non-profit for additional protection and public benefit?
   1. YES — Points: 20
   2. NO — Points: 0
4. Describe the type of future management of the easement and future potential costs to NRCS:
   1. Site will be passively managed by placement of easement — Points: 20
   2. Site will require limited management (mowing, additional plantings, invasive
      management) — Points: 10
   3. Site will need structural practice(s) and active on-site management — Points: 0
5. Review the estimated restoration cost per acres based on the PWRPO and the engineering estimate:
   1. No restoration will be needed — Points: 20
   2. Restoration cost is less than 50 percent of estimated easement value — Points: 16
   3. Restoration cost is between 50-100 percent of estimated easement value — Points: 12
   4. Restoration Cost is greater than 100 percent of estimated easement cost — Points: 8
6. Will the easement be on tribal Land or land owned by a historically underserved participant (HU) Underrepresented Groups?
   1. YES — Points: 12
   2. NO — Points: 0
7. Resource priority areas - Are the PLU located in the SLAMM Area?
   1. Yes — Points: 20
   2. Otherwise — Points: 0
8. Resource priority areas - Are the PLU located in the State Forest Priority Area?
   1. Yes — Points: 8
   2. Otherwise — Points: 0
9. Resource priority area - Are the PLU located in Drinking water supply watershed (surface water)?
   1. Yes — Points: 28
   2. Otherwise — Points: 0
10. Are the PLU Located in the NRCS Source Water Priority Areas?
    1. Yes — Points: 10
    2. Otherwise — Points: 0
11. Resource Priority Areas- Are the PLU within 300 FT of a Cold Water Stream?
    1. Yes — Points: 20
    2. Otherwise — Points: 0
12. Proximity of proposed easement to state designated impaired waters:
    1. The impaired water is within or adjacent to the easement boundary — Points: 20
    2. The proposed easement flows to impaired waters and is within 100 feet of the impaired water — Points: 10
    3. Otherwise — Points: 0
13. What is the percentage of the parcel with Prime or Statewide Important Soils?
    1. Parcel is 25 percent or less Prime or Statewide Important Soils — Points: 5
    2. Parcel is greater that 25 percent Prime or Statewide Important Soils — Points: 0

Resource Questions 

Planners to identify any natural heritage and species criteria.

1. Has Eastern Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) presence been
   documented on this site? 
   1. Yes — Points: 9
   2. No — Points: 0
2. Is Saltmarsh sparrow (Ammospiza caudacutus) habitat been documented on this site?
   1. Yes — Points: 9
   2. No — Points: 0
3. Does this parcel fall within the Priority Watersheds for the Northeast Turtle Project (see Priority map) or have any of the two RI priority turtle species, Spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata) or Wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) been documented as present on this site?
   1. Yes — Points: 9
   2. No — Points: 0
4. Select the wetland priority type that applies:
   1. Coastal Salt Marsh, Fens , Bogs, Vernal Pools, Atlantic white cedar, Wet meadows — Points: 21
   2. Otherwise — Points: 0
5. Complexity and Diversity of Wetland Types:
   1. The proposed easement has 2 or more Rhode Island wetland types — Points: 2
   2. The proposed easement has only 1 wetland type — Points: 0
6. Will the sites include identified TE species or State Species of Concerns?
   1. Site includes or intersects areas id by the Natural Heritage GIS layer — Points: 4
   2. Otherwise — Points: 0
7. Restoration of existing communities versus alternative communities:
   1. Wetland restoration will include NO alternative communities — Points: 4
   2. Wetland restoration will include alternative communities — Points: 2
8. Connectivity to beneficial adjacent land:
   1. Adjacent lands have the ability to provide SIGNIFICANT wildlife habitat that provide a high degree of benefit to the proposed easements (Site provides a migratory path between other suitable areas for key species) — Points: 12
   2. Adjacent lands have MODERATE ability to provide wildlife habitat (Site provides a migratory path between other suitable areas for key species) — Points: 6
9. Degree of hydrologic restoration to be completed based on the preliminary or final PWRPO:
   1. 100-50 percent of degraded areas of the eligible wetland will be restored — Points: 100
   2. Between 25-50 percent of the degraded areas of the wetlands will be restored — Points: 75
   3. Less than 25 percent of the degraded areas will be restored — Points: 20
10. Select the number that is closest to the proposed WRE eligible easement size:
    1. Greater than or equal to 50 acres — Points: 5
    2. Between 25 and up to 50 — Points: 3
    3. Between 10 and up to 25 acres — Points: 2
    4. Less than 10 acres — Points: 0
11. Select the number of the "Length of Riparian Area" that approximates to the property:
    1. Greater than or equal to 2640 feet — Points: 15
    2. Between 1000 feet and up to 2640 feet — Points: 10
    3. Between 500 feet and up to 1000 feet — Points: 5
    4. Less than 500 feet — Points: 2
12. Environmental Consideration: Wetland Buffers (to determine this factor take the widest width on either side of the wetland that is eligible):
    1. Proposed Easement will allow for greater than 100 feet of buffer — Points: 7
    2. Proposed Easement will allow 100 to 50 feet of buffer — Points: 5
    3. Proposed Easement will allow for less than 50 feet of buffer — Points: 1
    4. Proposed Easement will have no buffer — Points: 0
13. Buffer condition with respect to invasive plants:
    1. Proposed easement buffer has minimal invasive species and will require no restoration — Points: 3
    2. Otherwise — Points: 0