2014 NRI Rangeland Resource Assessment - Index of Tables
Introduction | Regional Interpretation
| Rangeland Health | Non-Native Plant Species |
Native Invasive Woody Species | Bare Ground,
Inter-Canopy Gaps, and Soil Aggregate Stability | About the Data | Index of
Tables | Index of Maps
Rangeland Health
Table 1. Standard indicators included in the Rangeland Health protocol and attribute
(soil and site stability, hydrologic function, and/or biotic integrity) to which each indicator applies (Pellant et.al. 2005)
Table 2. Non-Federal rangeland by state where rangeland health attribute ratings
are moderate, moderate-to-extreme, or extreme-to-total departures from expected
Table 3. Non-Federal rangeland by state where soil and site stability ratings are
none-to-slight or slight-to-moderate; moderate; or moderate-to-extreme or extreme-to-total departures from expected
Table 4. Non-Federal rangeland by state where hydrologic function ratings are
none-to-slight or slight-to-moderate; moderate; or moderate-to-extreme or extreme-to-total departures from expected
Table 5. Non-Federal rangeland by state where biotic integrity ratings are none-to-
slight or slight-to-moderate; moderate; or moderate-to-extreme or extreme-to-total departures from expected
Table 6. Non-Federal rangeland by state where all three attribute ratings are none-
to-slight or slight-to-moderate; all three attribute ratings are moderate-to-extreme or extreme-to-total; and where at least one attribute
is rated moderate departures from expected
Non-native Invasive Plant Species
Table 1. Non-native invasive herbaceous species groups
Table 2. Non-federal rangeland where non-native plant species are present; where
they cover at least 25 percent or 50 percent of the soil surface; and where they make up at least 25 percent or 50 percent of the
relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 3. Non-Federal rangeland where annual brome species are present and
where they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 4. Non-Federal rangeland where annual brome species are present and
where they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 5. Non-Federal rangeland where cheatgrass is present and where it covers
at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 6. Non-Federal rangeland where cheatgrass is present and where it makes
up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 7. Non-Federal rangeland where medusahead species are present and
where they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface)
Table 8. Non-Federal rangeland where medusahead species are present and
where they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 9. Non-Federal rangeland where Kentucky and Canada bluegrass species
are present and where they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 10. Non-Federal rangeland where Kentucky and Canada bluegrass species
are present and where they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 11. Non-Federal rangeland where buffelgrass species are present and
where they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 12. Non-Federal rangeland where buffelgrass species are present and
where they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 13. Non-Federal rangeland where halogeton species are present and where
they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 14. Non-Federal rangeland where halogeton species are present and where
they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 15. Non-Federal rangeland where Centaurea species are present and
where they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 16. Non-Federal rangeland where Centaurea species are present and
where they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 17. Non-Federal rangeland where Cirsium species are present and where
they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 18. Non-Federal rangeland where Cirsium species are present and where
they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Table 19. Non-Federal rangeland where leafy spurge species are present and
where they cover at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the soil surface
Table 20. Non-Federal rangeland where leafy spurge species are present and
where they make up at least 5%, 15%, 30%, or 50% of the relative plant canopy cover (composition)
Native Invasive Woody Species
Table 1. Invasive woody species groups
Table 2. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where Pacific junipers are
present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil surface
Table 3. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where Pacific junipers are
present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the relative plant cover (composition)
Table 4. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where
Montane/Intermontane junipers are present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil surface
Table 5. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where
Montane/Intermontane junipers are present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the relative plant cover
(composition)
Table 6. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where Southern junipers
are present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil surface
Table 7. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where Southern junipers
are present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the relative plant cover (composition)
Table 8. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where Eastern junipers
are present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil surface
Table 9. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where Eastern junipers
are present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the relative plant cover (composition)
Table 10. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where mesquite are
present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil surface
Table 11. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where mesquite are
present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the relative plant cover (composition)
Table 12. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where six species of
pinyon pine (PICE, PIDI3, PIED, PIMO, PIQU, and PIRE5) are present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil
surface
Table 13. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where six species of
pinyon pine (PICE, PIDI3, PIED, PIMO, PIQU, and PIRE5) are present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the
relative plant cover (composition)
Table 14. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where two species of
pinyon pine (PIED and PIMO) are present or where they cover at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the soil surface
Table 15. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where two species of
pinyon pine (PIED and PIMO) are present or where they comprise at least 5, 15, 30 or 50 percent of the relative plant cover
(composition)
Table 16. Non-Federal rangeland in 48 coterminous states where native woody
species groups are present but excluded from reference conditions
Bare Ground, Inter-Canopy Gaps, and Soil Aggregate Stability
Table 1. Bare ground on non-Federal rangeland
Table 2. Non-Federal rangeland that is at least 20, 30, 40, or 50 percent bare
ground
Table 3. Non-Federal rangeland where 1 or 2 meter inter-canopy gaps account for
at least 20 percent of the land; and non-Federal rangeland where 1 or 2 meter inter-canopy gaps account for at least 20 percent of
the land and the inter-canopy gaps are at least 50 percent bare ground
Table 4. Non-Federal rangeland where soil aggregate stability is rated 4 or
less
Table 5. Non-Federal rangeland where 1-meter inter-canopy gaps account for at
least 20% of the land and the inter-canopy gaps have at least 5, 10, 15, or 20 percent lichen crust or moss cover
