|
NRCS Conservation Programs
Healthy Forests Reserve Program (HFRP)
The purpose of the Healthy Forests Reserve Program (HFRP) is to assist landowners, on a voluntary
basis, in restoring, enhancing and protecting forestland resources on private lands through easements,
30-year contracts and 10-year cost-share agreements. The objectives of HFRP are to promote the recovery
of endangered and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), improve plant and animal
biodiversity, and enhance carbon sequestration.
To learn more see HFRP
For easement counts and easement acres, see
Easement Program Data dashboard
Financial Information: Total Obligations | Technical Assistance | Financial Assistance
Conservation Practice Implementation Reports: by State | by State and Conservation Practices related to: Fish & Wildlife Habitat | Forest Land Conservation
Financial Information
The Financial Information section presents data from the USDA Office of the Chief
Financial Officer's Financial Management Modernization Initiative (FMMI) system and
its predecessor, the Foundation Financial Information System (FFIS). The Financial Information
presented here is Total Obligations which the Government Accountability Office defines as
binding agreements (orders
placed, contracts awarded, services rendered, etc.) that will result in outlays,
immediately or in the future. Before obligations can be incurred, budgetary resources
must be made available by Congress. The obligations displayed for each year are the total
obligations reported as of the end of each fiscal year. Subsequent adjustments after the
close of the fiscal year are not included.
There are two categories of Total Obligations presented below:
- Technical Assistance (TA) Obligations
refer to the scientific expertise, natural resource
data, tools, and technology that USDA NRCS personnel provide to help producers, landowners,
and communities develop conservation plans and implement conservation practices to solve
natural resource problems at the field, operation, or larger landscape scales. NRCS is the
lead agency for providing technical assistance for USDA.
- Financial Assistance (FA) Obligations
refer to the commitment of funds to contracts for payments that will be made to program
participants for the purchase of easements and for implementing conservation practices,
which can provide both on-site and off-site conservation benefits.
This program does not include Reimbursable funds.
Financial data should not be incorporated with the programmatic enrollment data provided below to
derive a cost/acre or cost/agreement. Among other reasons, such calculations will not produce accurate
results since both technical assistance and financial assistance obligations for associated conservation
practices are included in these data, in addition to the obligations used for purchasing easements.
|
|
HFRP Total Obligations, by Fiscal Year
In thousands of dollars
Division |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Arkansas | $123.1
|
$8.6
|
$8.8
|
$0.1
|
|
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$636.7
|
$706.7
|
$413.4
|
$152.4
|
|
$0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia | $244.2
|
$92.8
|
$2,539.4
|
$218.1
|
$21.2
|
|
$7.2
|
$437.2
|
|
|
|
|
$2,458.1
|
$-8.9
|
Indiana | $137.2
|
$1,356.4
|
$1,595.2
|
$12.1
|
$628.1
|
$30.1
|
$11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
$139.6
|
$-4.7
|
Kentucky |
|
$83.5
|
$1,496.7
|
$2,219.5
|
$1,209.4
|
$223.7
|
$64.3
|
$32.8
|
$15.2
|
|
|
$15.5
|
|
|
Maine | $26.9
|
$5.6
|
$16.5
|
$259.6
|
$36.2
|
$40.2
|
$0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
$13.2
|
$179.3
|
$235.7
|
$490.7
|
$-2.9
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.0
|
$22.5
|
Mississippi | $1,034.2
|
$1,016.9
|
$92.9
|
$414.5
|
$704.8
|
$-22.3
|
$-16.2
|
$-1.7
|
$109.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
$19.0
|
$128.8
|
$222.6
|
$85.2
|
$-6.2
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma | $425.9
|
$1,443.1
|
$3,734.0
|
$609.4
|
$272.9
|
$139.6
|
$719.8
|
$22.2
|
$12.0
|
$47.1
|
$50.0
|
$16.3
|
|
$18.0
|
Oregon | $448.3
|
$3,250.4
|
$5,959.2
|
$4,152.0
|
$1,810.6
|
$91.4
|
|
$38.2
|
|
|
|
|
$479.2
|
$5.8
|
Pennsylvania |
|
$4.5
|
$112.0
|
$1,437.8
|
$650.7
|
$58.8
|
$298.3
|
$163.1
|
|
|
|
|
$56.6
|
$3.2
|
South Carolina |
|
|
$1,207.2
|
$-448.0
|
$318.6
|
|
$0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
| $181.3
|
$15.2
|
$134.0
|
$96.4
|
$62.5
|
$24.3
|
$198.5
|
$12.0
|
$16.8
|
$23.4
|
$4.0
|
$170.5
|
|
|
Total
| $2,621.0
|
$7,946.0
|
$17,910.8
|
$9,843.1
|
$6,443.3
|
$576.7
|
$1,284.2
|
$703.8
|
$153.1
|
$70.5
|
$54.0
|
$202.3
|
$3,143.5
|
$35.9
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, 2012-2022 data from Financial Management Modernization
Initiative (FMMI); 2009-2011 data from Foundation Financial Information
System (FFIS).
• Other indicates Headquarters, Regional, or other non-State divisions.
• Negative numbers reflect fund adjustments made throughout the year.
• Totals may not exactly match sum over divisions due to rounding.
|
HFRP Technical Assistance Obligations, by Fiscal Year
In thousands of dollars
Division |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Arkansas | $3.8
|
$8.6
|
$8.8
|
$0.1
|
|
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$36.7
|
$107.7
|
$61.7
|
$45.4
|
|
$0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia | $240.2
|
$92.8
|
$309.0
|
$17.2
|
|
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
$102.0
|
$-8.9
|
Indiana | $108.4
|
$202.1
|
$100.5
|
$45.9
|
$59.6
|
$-176.2
|
$4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
$9.2
|
$-4.7
|
Kentucky |
|
$25.0
|
$249.2
|
$178.1
|
$290.9
|
$-1,795.7
|
$36.3
|
$3.6
|
$15.1
|
|
|
$0.5
|
|
|
Maine | $26.9
|
$5.6
|
$16.5
|
$24.6
|
|
|
$0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
$1.6
|
$18.8
|
$60.3
|
$106.7
|
$-99.0
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$20.1
|
Mississippi | $130.5
|
$134.6
|
$16.2
|
$47.9
|
$110.3
|
$-320.0
|
$-16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
$8.4
|
$103.5
|
$35.4
|
$29.6
|
$-6.2
|
$0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma | $419.3
|
$466.7
|
$221.3
|
$115.8
|
$229.3
|
$-329.1
|
$-168.2
|
$1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
$16.2
|
Oregon | $289.8
|
$468.5
|
$260.2
|
$475.3
|
$179.2
|
$90.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.0
|
$5.8
|
Pennsylvania |
|
$3.6
|
$24.0
|
$203.9
|
$107.1
|
$-0.5
|
$-3.5
|
$27.9
|
|
|
|
|
$56.6
|
$3.2
|
South Carolina |
|
|
$257.2
|
$17.0
|
$4.8
|
$-435.0
|
$0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
| $145.7
|
$15.3
|
$130.8
|
$96.7
|
$62.5
|
$24.3
|
$176.3
|
|
$2.8
|
$23.4
|
$4.0
|
$170.5
|
|
|
Total
| $1,364.6
|
$1,469.6
|
$1,823.9
|
$1,379.8
|
$1,225.4
|
$-3,046.9
|
$30.0
|
$33.0
|
$17.9
|
$23.4
|
$4.0
|
$171.0
|
$169.8
|
$31.7
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, 2012-2022 data from Financial Management Modernization
Initiative (FMMI); 2009-2011 data from Foundation Financial Information
System (FFIS).
• Other indicates Headquarters, Regional, or other non-State divisions.
• Negative numbers reflect fund adjustments made throughout the year.
• Totals may not exactly match sum over divisions due to rounding.
|
HFRP Financial Assistance Obligations, by Fiscal Year
In thousands of dollars
Division |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Arkansas | $119.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$600.0
|
$599.0
|
$351.7
|
$107.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia | $4.0
|
|
$2,230.4
|
$200.9
|
$21.2
|
|
$7.0
|
$437.2
|
|
|
|
|
$2,356.1
|
|
Indiana | $28.8
|
$1,154.3
|
$1,494.8
|
$-33.8
|
$568.5
|
$206.3
|
$7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$130.4
|
|
Kentucky |
|
$58.5
|
$1,247.5
|
$2,041.4
|
$918.5
|
$2,019.3
|
$28.0
|
$29.3
|
$0.1
|
|
|
$15.0
|
|
|
Maine |
|
|
|
$235.0
|
$36.2
|
$40.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
$11.6
|
$160.5
|
$175.4
|
$384.0
|
$96.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.0
|
$2.4
|
Mississippi | $903.7
|
$882.3
|
$76.7
|
$366.6
|
$594.5
|
$297.7
|
|
$-1.7
|
$109.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
$10.6
|
$25.3
|
$187.2
|
$55.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma | $6.6
|
$976.3
|
$3,512.7
|
$493.6
|
$43.6
|
$468.6
|
$888.0
|
$20.7
|
$12.0
|
$47.1
|
$50.0
|
$16.3
|
|
$1.8
|
Oregon | $158.6
|
$2,781.9
|
$5,699.0
|
$3,676.7
|
$1,631.4
|
$0.9
|
|
$38.2
|
|
|
|
|
$477.2
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
$1.0
|
$88.0
|
$1,233.9
|
$543.6
|
$59.3
|
$301.9
|
$135.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina |
|
|
$950.0
|
$-465.0
|
$313.8
|
$435.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
| $35.6
|
|
$3.1
|
$-0.3
|
|
|
$22.2
|
$12.0
|
$13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
| $1,256.5
|
$6,476.5
|
$16,086.9
|
$8,463.3
|
$5,217.9
|
$3,623.6
|
$1,254.2
|
$670.9
|
$135.1
|
$47.1
|
$50.0
|
$31.3
|
$2,973.7
|
$4.2
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, 2012-2022 data from Financial Management Modernization
Initiative (FMMI); 2009-2011 data from Foundation Financial Information
System (FFIS).
• Other indicates Headquarters, Regional, or other non-State divisions.
• Negative numbers reflect fund adjustments made throughout the year.
• Totals may not exactly match sum over divisions due to rounding.
Conservation Practice Implementation |
Conservation practices are planned and applied
at the land unit level. The land unit is the smallest unit of land that has a
permanent or contiguous boundary, a common land cover and land management, and a common owner or a
common producer. The following tables include data for the fiscal years since enactment of the 2008 Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act (Farm Bill) in 2009.
This RCA release uses an updated field definition. Heretofore the National Planning and Agreements
Database (NPAD) Land Unit Id was used to represent fields wherever estimates of unique acres treated
were required. This identifier is found in the planning land unit database layer. However, since
conservation plans are often updated as producers’ conservation decisions evolve over time, there can
be multiple land unit identifiers associated with the same field in NPAD. This can result in
overestimating the number of fields and the associated unique acres. The Resource Analytics Lab has
used GIS to develop a shape based algorithm to eliminate the overcounting of fields by selecting the
single best shape out of the multiple shape based identifiers associated with the same field.
As conservation practices are measured in different units (acres, feet, square feet, etc.),
the challenge for reporting performance at various levels is how to aggregate across practices.
Although practices may affect resources beyond the land unit boundary, or be applied only on part
of the land unit, the land unit does provide a common metric to aggregate over practices since each
applied practice is associated with a specific land unit. Analysis of the data reveals that most
practices are measured in acres and most of the practice applied amounts match the land unit acres
of the field on which the practice was applied. Therefore, land unit acreage is the metric on which
the acres of land receiving conservation treatment are calculated.
The data presented in this section reflect the fiscal year in which conservation practices were
applied, which can occur at any point during the duration of the
HFRP
contract.
Totals presented here are not comparable to program enrollment acres or contract acres.
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation
|
The following table summarizes land unit acres by fiscal year.
Here, land unit acres are counted once when the program has been used to apply one or
more practices on that land unit in a given fiscal year. Therefore, land unit acres
may be counted multiple times across fiscal years.
|
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation (including practice count),
by Fiscal Year
HFRP Practices
State |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Arkansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
1
|
120
|
11
|
120
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
10,304
|
25
|
4,414
|
43
|
10,951
|
20
|
9,404
|
83
|
|
|
1,211
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana | 1,085
|
1
|
|
|
52
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi |
|
|
|
|
279
|
9
|
31
|
51
|
|
|
48
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
184
|
19
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
167
|
2
|
|
|
751
|
5
|
|
|
159
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
69
|
11
|
|
|
20
|
10
|
|
|
140
|
10
|
273
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
6
|
139
|
18
|
138
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
| 1,085
|
1
|
|
|
10,870
|
53
|
4,444
|
94
|
11,722
|
35
|
9,453
|
86
|
299
|
12
|
1,485
|
17
|
1,482
|
185
|
226
|
52
|
1,106
|
38
|
389
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, National Planning and Agreements Database (NPAD), October 2022.
• Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years.
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation by Practice
|
The following set of chart/table combinations present conservation practice data grouped by purpose:
Fish & Wildlife Habitat and Forest Land Conservation. Any practices not included in one of these groups are
included in an All Other category. Data for practices in the All Other category can be
downloaded
in the Farm Bill Conservation Programs Profile csv file.
Note that there is some overlap between these groupings, since some practices address
multiple resource concerns.
Here land unit acres are counted each time a practice is applied on that land unit in the fiscal year.
Therefore land unit acres may be counted multiple times across practices, practice groupings, and fiscal years.
To learn more about specific conservation practices, see the
National Handbook of Conservation Practices.
Conservation Practices Related to Fish & Wildlife |
The following chart and table includes practices that are related to Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management.
The environment that NRCS helps its clients conserve, maintain, and improve is also habitat for
fish & wildlife and other biological resources. While every practice and management action taken
on the land has some effect on biological resources, the following practices are specifically related to
fish & wildlife habitat.
|
Only practices representing a significant portion of the total for
the period are included in the above chart. If applicable, practices not included are summed into the All Other
category.
|
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation (including practice count) by Fiscal Year
HFRP Fish & Wildlife Habitat Practices
Practice Name |
Practice Code |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Access Control | 472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
11
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
1
|
|
|
30
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management | 647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats | 643 |
|
|
|
|
2
|
2
|
88
|
12
|
|
|
31
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
6
|
785
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riparian Forest Buffer | 391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stream Habitat Improvement and Management | 395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management | 645 |
|
|
|
|
138
|
2
|
|
|
35
|
2
|
|
|
233
|
5
|
779
|
4
|
1,851
|
34
|
234
|
7
|
32
|
7
|
328
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management | 644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
2
|
22
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, National Planning and Agreements Database (NPAD), October 2022.
• Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years.
• Watering Facility (614) is not included in the above table. It is included for
the purposes of this report in the All Other Practices category.
|
The following table includes program information under which the above practices related to
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management were applied. These data reflect the geographic extent of the
land treated with fish & wildlife habitat practices by each conservation program during a fiscal year.
Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years, but are only counted
once per fiscal year.
|
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation (including practice count) by Fiscal Year
HFRP Fish & Wildlife Habitat Practices
|
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Land Unit Acres treated by at least one practice |
|
|
|
|
71
|
4
|
31
|
27
|
20
|
3
|
1,242
|
3
|
140
|
5
|
273
|
5
|
1,420
|
34
|
139
|
18
|
809
|
9
|
323
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, National Planning and Agreements Database (NPAD), October 2022.
• Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years.
Conservation Practices Related to Forest Land Conservation |
The following chart and table includes practices that are related to Forest Land Conservation.
The goals of these practices are to restore and protect forest resources and improve fish and
wildlife habitat and are related to: tree planting; forest stand improvement; thinning;
prescribed burning; and controlling invasive plants. Note that only practices applied on grazed
forest or forest land are included.
|
Only practices representing a significant portion of the total for
the period are included in the above chart. If applicable, practices not included are summed into the All Other
category.
|
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation (including practice count) by Fiscal Year
HFRP Forest Land Conservation Practices
Practice Name |
Practice Code |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Access Control | 472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
10
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
1
|
|
|
30
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management | 647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firebreak | 394 |
|
|
|
|
63
|
1
|
52
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424
|
7
|
120
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Stand Improvement | 666 | 1,085
|
1
|
|
|
82
|
4
|
52
|
5
|
110
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
1
|
1,305
|
22
|
60
|
4
|
788
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Trails and Landings | 655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
1
|
|
|
30
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel Break | 383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) | 595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prescribed Burning | 338 |
|
|
|
|
63
|
1
|
47
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,121
|
70
|
120
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats | 643 |
|
|
|
|
0
|
1
|
88
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
6
|
785
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riparian Forest Buffer | 391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment | 654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tree/Shrub Establishment | 612 |
|
|
|
|
151
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
685
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation | 490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
1
|
1,297
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management | 645 |
|
|
|
|
138
|
2
|
|
|
35
|
2
|
|
|
140
|
1
|
779
|
4
|
1,798
|
31
|
30
|
2
|
10
|
6
|
251
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, National Planning and Agreements Database (NPAD), October 2022.
• Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years.
|
The following table includes program information under which the above practices related to
Forest Land Conservation were applied. These data reflect the geographic extent of forest and grazed
forest land treated with conservation practices by each conservation program during a fiscal year.
Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years, but are only counted
once per fiscal year.
|
Land Unit Acres Receiving Conservation (including practice count) by Fiscal Year
HFRP Forest Land Conservation Practices
|
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Acres |
Count |
Land Unit Acres treated by at least one practice | 1,085
|
1
|
|
|
132
|
14
|
31
|
43
|
771
|
15
|
|
|
140
|
1
|
273
|
8
|
1,429
|
171
|
19
|
33
|
787
|
13
|
251
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
• Data Source: USDA-NRCS, National Planning and Agreements Database (NPAD), October 2022.
• Land unit acres may be counted multiple times across fiscal years.
|
More Information
The data in this report in CSV format (file includes all titles and table notes) can be
downloaded here.
Selected data for RCA programs reports in excel format (machine readable flat files) can be
found here.
Return to the
RCA Data Viewer.
For more information about NRCS Conservation Programs,
visit
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/
Citation for this website:
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Financial Management Modernization Initiative (FMMI) 2012-2022 Data October 2022
Foundation Financial Information System (FFIS) 2009-2011 Data
National Planning and Agreements Database (NPAD) October 2022
Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC. 31 March 2023*
<http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/rca-data-viewer/>
*[use date the website was accessed]
|