General Questions
Where can we find the recording of the informational webinar held on May 19, 2026?
The recording will be available on the VPA-HIP website once 508 compliance review is completed.
How are proposals submitted?
All proposals must be submitted through Grants.gov. Refer to Section D.2. of the Notice of funding opportunity to find the link to access all templates for proposal submission. Updated versions of proposal documents can be found in Grants.gov. Use of 2025 or 2026 versions of any required documents will be accepted.
If awarded, will NRCS utilize ezFedGrants to manage the award and reporting?
Yes, ezFedGrants will be the software used for program management of the projects.
Please explain why the full, appropriated $70 million is not available this year.
The appropriations show the total amount that a program is provided for a specific period. Agencies do not have to release all of that funding at once. In this case, additional funding will be offered to the public in another fiscal year.
The Notice of Funding Opportunity states that an estimated award date will be September 30th, how likely is that?
This date is an estimate, so grants will not begin until a fully executed agreement is in place that is signed by both parties. Since agreement negotiation can take time, this date is estimated.
Is the award date and the project start date the same?
As an applicant, you can always include a budget start date in your statement of work that is different from the award date. The award date is the date that the agreement is fully executed. The start date is the date the grantee begins to incur costs to the project. Grantees can request a start date after the award date to accommodate various project activities, such as lining up with a planting season, a growing season, school semesters; you can be allowed to set the start date later than the award date if it better aligns to budget costs. For the purposes of the agreement, project start dates cannot precede the award date.
While this is 3-year money, would it be permissible for us to encumber those funds for longer-term leases with landowners? We are investing significant resources to establish habitat, primarily through crop-to-grass conversion, and we'd like to secure longer-term public access agreements with landowners. We have a lease mechanism to do this. I'm wondering whether, if we have those longer-term, legally binding leases in place and encumber the money for 10 or 15 years, that will constitute spending from your perspective if we encumber those funds within the three-year grant window?
Leasing beyond the agreement’s period of performance is not allowed. VPA-HIP has a maximum 3-year period and all expenditures of the grant funding must be made during that period. Corresponding regulations regarding encumbrance are found in 2 CFR 200.403h and 2 CFR 200.344. Applicants will not be required to recalculate the budgets in the proposal as these details can be worked out later.
Is through access for public land eligible, specifically paying a private landowner for access through their private land to access landlocked, otherwise inaccessible public land beyond their deeded land?
Public access incentive payments must be made to landowners for access to wildlife dependent recreation on their land. Unlocking inaccessible public land beyond their deeded land can be a co-benefit.
Budget Questions
If we have time-dependent purchases that need to be made for our project and they are before the project start date, can we get approved for pre-award costs?
Pre-award costs are allowed in the federal regulations for grants. The agency allows pre-award costs for both federal and non-federal funding in special circumstances. Requests for pre-award costs are submitted during agreement negotiation and are approved for only a certain amount of time. Costs that do not fall into that time period cannot be applied. In addition, approval of pre-award costs does not mean the award will successfully be negotiated and therefore they are only reimbursable if a successful agreement negotiation takes place.
Does the 10% technical assistance cap apply toward partners, subawards, and staff time that are under contract by the state agency to help implement the program?
The intent of the program funding is to ensure incentive funding to producers to encourage opening private land to public access. Therefore, the 10% technical assistance cap includes grantee personnel costs in addition to personnel costs in subawards or contractor costs that are used to enroll landowners in public access program or to implement wildlife habitat improvements program lands. Although non-federal cost share is not a requirement of this award, and is no longer used as a ranking criteria of proposals, it is not unexpected that each project team will need to provide additional technical assistance through their own funding to complete a project.
Are indirect costs allowed and are they also allowed for our subawards? Can a subaward apply a higher indirect cost rate than the grantee may be using?
Yes, the VPA-HIP program allows awardees to charge indirect costs to their awards. In addition, subawards can also charge indirect costs. Indirect costs are capped at 15% unless the applicant has a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (NICRA) with the federal government. In these cases, the grantee can apply their NICRA rates. Contractors cannot apply indirect costs to awards; only sub-awards can. Sub-awards can apply their own NICRA rate; they cannot use the grantee’s NICRA rate. All organizations have the right to apply their NICRA rate as long as it is current. See 7 CFR 200.332 for more information and when there is a conflict for cost principles language in the Notice of funding opportunity vs the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the CFR will prevail.
If a program supported by this award collects program income from some of the activities, can this funding be additional funding used for the project?
Yes, programs are allowed to generate income from project activities during the life of the award and this income needs to be spent on the project activities. If the project team cannot spend this funding on additional activities that are already approved and fall under the current project objectives, they will need to use this funding instead of a portion of the federal funding. If this causes additional activities to be created that align with the project goals, but are not already approved, these will need to be approved by the award agency.
Can VPA-HIP programs be leveraged to provide incentives for specific species access, such as deer, in areas where hunter access for deer population management is lacking?
Yes, VPA-HIP incentive payments for public access need to be focused on wildlife-dependent recreational activities. Applicants should describe what activities will be promoted and allowed on the land that is open for public access. This can include activities for a single species.
Can a landowner agreement be signed prior to the grant execution?
In most situations, no. According to the USDA General terms and conditions (page 18), the requirements that apply to the Federal award recipient flow down to subrecipients and therefore when they enter into a formal written agreement with the subrecipient, it needs to address the requirements of the federal award. Subrecipient agreements are legally binding only after the formal execution of the contract, which must happen on or after the official start date of the federal award.
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), Highly Erodible Land (HEL), Wetland Compliance (WC) and Eligibility
Regarding the AGI requirements, you stated a project can be set up in a way that makes the public the beneficiary and not the landowner. How can we determine when the public is considered the beneficiary as compared to the landowner who is receiving the payment?
In most situations, applicability of AGI will not apply. The main goal of the program is to give the public access to private lands that they normally cannot use for fishing, and other wildlife-dependent recreation. Because of that, the public—not the landowner—is considered the beneficiary.
States or tribes may provide financial incentives to landowners or procure goods and services to meet the requirements of their grant agreement. These payments, by themselves, do not make the landowner a program beneficiary, and they do not trigger AGI rules the way other conservation programs might.
However, a state or tribe could design a project where the landowner does become a beneficiary. This would happen when VPA‑HIP funds are used in a way that mainly benefits the landowner rather than the public.
For example, if the project uses VPA‑HIP funds to install habitat improvements on private land and the public is not allowed to access the improved area, then the landowner receives the primary benefit. Up to 25% of VPA‑HIP funding can be used for habitat improvements, so this situation is possible.
If NRCS selects a project where the landowner is considered a beneficiary, all land and producer eligibility rules apply, including AGI requirements. In those cases, state or tribes would need to request that landowners/producers who require eligibility visit their local FSA Office to ensure that farm records exist and eligibility provisions are met. This is a self-certification that the awardee provides assurances to the project state, when applicable.
In summary, when the public is the beneficiary:
- AGI is NOT triggered;
- The payment to the landowner is compensation for allowing public access and habitat improvements for public use; and
- The public receives the main benefit.
This will apply to most VPA-HIP projects
When the landowner is the beneficiary:
- AGI IS triggered;
- VPA-HIP funds improve habitat on private land and the improvement does not result in public access; and
- The landowner receives the primary benefit.
The Producer Eligibility information concerning HEL, AGI, and duplicative payments does not apply to the typical landowner. Isn’t requiring state agencies to determine and "self-certify" these requirements preventative for many states that have historically used VPA-HIP?
If your project only provides access, and does not include habitat improvement work, then you most likely don’t need to worry about this section. However, if the project included wildlife improvement work, then depending on the type of work, NRCS may need to ensure that the producer is not also participating in another USDA conservation program which is providing payment for the same work. Should NRCS select a project that triggers this section, then NRCS will coordinate with the State or Tribe to ensure it is met.
The provision that the state agencies will self-certify is applicable in cases where eligibility is going to be required. Awardees will have to work with those state NRCS offices and ensure the landowners complete the required eligibility documentation with their local Farm Service Agency office.
These requirements are not expected to be triggered by most (if not all) proposals submitted by States or Tribes. However, the inclusion of these requirements in the VPA-HIP Notice of Funding Opportunity is required to ensure all federal funding actions are compliant with Executive Orders of the President, to include EO 14332 and EO 14249.
To determine if land is eligible, do they need to have a Farm and Tract Number?
Yes, in cases where eligibility is going to be applicable, then it would require that the land is registered with the USDA Farm Service Agency, which requires a farm and tract number, highly erodible land and wetland determination.
If the property being enrolled in VPA-HIP is in a USDA program like CRP or WRP, then AGI is already met, correct?
AGI would have been verified at the time the producer enrolled in the other USDA programs. However, if AGI is applicable for VPA-HIP, the producer/landowner would need to ensure AGI eligibility in the year that they will receive VPA-HIP funding.
If a state simply provides a payment to a landowner (say $5 an acre) for providing public access, no AGI, HEL or WC is required? Is it only required if paying to do habitat work or land improvement on a landowner's land?
Yes, payment for providing access only would not trigger the need for meeting USDA eligibility for the landowner or the land.
WRE/WRP and Interaction with other NRCS Programs
Can land enrolled in CSP also be enrolled for access via VPA-HIP funds? If so, please provide an example of how VPA-HIP funds would be considered duplicative on land enrolled in CSP.
Yes, land enrolled in CSP can also be enrolled in VPA-HIP, but habitat improvement practices installed through CSP would not allow for the same conservation practices to be installed using VPA-HIP funds on the same land.
A subset of the funds was designated for WRE/WRP lands. If you do not have a project on WRE/WRP lands, do you have to complete a waiver?
If there are no WRE or WRP lands in the project area, please request a waiver to remove the need for the promotion requirement. Work with your local NRCS State office to find out if these lands are in the project area.
The Notice of Funding Opportunity also emphasizes land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP). Do you want applicants to focus on CREP acres similar to WRE?
No, CREP acres do not have to be the primary focus, but those acres would be eligible for VPA-HIP and must be checked for possible duplicative practices. Conservation practices that were already installed with CREP or CRP funding would not be allowable for installation with VPA-HIP funding.
It was previously stated that the WRE/WRP locations are public information. Is this information available from the state NRCS office?
Yes, NRCS can provide a GIS layer to let you know exactly where those are located, and it is public information. The NRCS Easements Program Division also provides public access for the location of easements via these websites:
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=60cb4564f7b4461ca9a61fa224c066ba
https://www.conservationeasement.us/
https://farmlandinfo.org/statistics/pald/
Regarding the WRE/WRP question answered above, can NRCS also provide mailing info for those WRE lands to assist with outreach?
NRCS will provide as much information as legally allowed, but it might not be the full mailing address, and it might not be down to the farm and tract number. There are other ways to promote the program without having the exact landowner contact information, such as documenting how you intend to promote access to private lands with WRE and WRP in your state.
If an existing 1619 agreement is in place, can you get landowner information from NRCS?
NRCS works with awardees to develop a 1619 cooperator agreement, so there may still be limitations. There are other ways to promote the program without having the exact landowner contact information such as documenting how you intend to promote access to private lands with WRE and WRP in your state.