United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Go to Accessibility Information
Skip to Page Content


 

Buffalo Creek Watershed, New York

Area: 279,680
Counties: 2

The Buffalo Creek project was authorized for operations December 22, 1944, and completed in June 1964. It was the first of 11 authorized flood prevention projects to be completed. This project covers Erie and Wyoming Counties, including 13,440 acres within the city of Buffalo, and was jointly sponsored by the Erie County and the Wyoming County Soil Conservation Districts.

About 95 percent is private land and 5 percent public forest. About 44 percent is cropland, 20 percent woodland, 19 percent pasture, and 10 percent idle land. The rest is in urban areas, roads, or other uses.

The principal objective was to reduce sedimentation where the Buffalo River runs into Buffalo Harbor by controlling erosion on streambanks and farmland. Land treatment measures included conservation cropping systems hay planting, stripcropping, and farm ponds. More than 59 miles of actively eroding streambanks were stabilized by rock riprap and vegetation.

The Forest Service in cooperation with the new York State Conservation Department completed 35 forest management plans. These plans included planting trees, marking a large wooded area for timber stand improvement or harvest, and controlling erosion on logging roads.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Middle Colorado River Watershed, Texas

Area: 4,613,120 acres
Counties: 16

The Middle Colorado River project covers about 4,613,000 acres in the middle of the watershed of the Colorado River in Texas. It has 17 sub watersheds. The sponsors are the local soil conservation districts and some of the county and city governments.

The principal problem is flood and sediment damage to farmland. Almost all the farmland is privately owned.

Throughout the watershed, landowners needing land treatment measures have been given priority for financial assistance under the Agricultural Conservation Program and the Great Plains Conservation Program.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Coosa River Watershed, Georgia and Tennessee

Area: 1,339,400
Counties: 20

This project, which was begun in 1946, has 16 sub watersheds. More than 130,000 acres in national forest.

The Atlanta, Coosa River, Limestone Valley, and Upper Chattahoochee River Soil and Water Conservation Districts, and the Georgia State Highway Department sponsor this project.

The principal objective is to reduce erosion and flood and sediment damage to farmland and county roads. Conservation measures to solve these problems include planting pine trees, grass, and legumes to provide protective cover.

This project was completed and closed in 1981.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Little Sioux River Watershed, Iowa

Area: 1,740,800 acres
Counties: 13

Eight soil conservation districts sponsor this project. Four others have a limited interest. All are represented on the Little Sioux Works Committee, which provides overall guidance for administration of the program and established priorities for assistance. There are 130 sub watersheds in the Little Sioux which have potential for development as watershed projects.

Soil erosion is the major problem. Gully erosion has affected the economy of many farms on both the uplands and the bottomlands along the Missouri River. Crops on the 200,000-acre floodplain have been damaged by flooding and channels of the complex drainage system frequently choked by sediment.

The federal government assists farmers in planning land treatment measures to minimize runoff and erosion and in installing structural measures where most need.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Little Tallahatchie River Watershed, Mississippi

Area: 963,977 acres
Counties: 8

This watershed is in north central Mississippi, About 80 percent is private land and 10 percent is national forest. The rest is covered by the Sardis Reservoir, a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control on the Yazoo River. About 45 percent of the watershed is woodland, 25 percent cropland, 9 percent pasture, and 21 percent idle land or land in miscellaneous uses.

This project has 18 sub watersheds, each of which is sponsored by a water management district and the Tallahatchie River Soil Conservation District. The principal objective is to reduce flood and sediment damage to farmland.

Land treatment measures on cropland consist of rotating crops, terracing, and revegetating critical areas; on pasture, constructing contour furrows, seeding, sodding, fertilizing, and fencing; and on woodland, planting trees, planting kudzu in gullies, constructing brush dams, and constructing diversion terraces where necessary.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Los Angeles River Watershed, California

Area: 536,960 acres
Counties: 1

The Los Angeles River flood prevention project has 13 sub watersheds. Structural measures are planned for all sub watersheds. About 73 percent of the area is private land and the rest is part of the Angeles National Forest.

The Los Angeles County Flood Control District sponsors this project. Local cooperating agencies obtain all rights-of-way, arrange for and bear the entire cost of relocating utilities and replacing existing improvements. They operate and maintain the completed flood control measures. The federal government meets costs of all works on federal land.

Because of rapid urban development in the area, land treatment measures have consisted mainly of installing street drainage systems and storm drains. These have been planned and constructed entirely by local agencies.

In this watershed, erosion is particularly severe when high intensity or long duration rainstorms follow brush fires. Because of increased urban expansion and development, fire prevention practices are essential.

Structural measures include improving storm channels, protecting streambanks, stabilizing grades, and constructing debris basins, highway bridges, outlets, inlets, and other appurtenances.

Completed channel work has been highly effective. Storm runoff is adequately controlled, and water that previously overran natural channels is now carried harmlessly to impoundments and to the Los Angeles River.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Potomac River Watershed, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania

Area: 4,205,400 acres
Counties: 17

The Potomac River project covers parts of Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Sub watershed planning has been confined mainly to the tributaries of the upper Potomac River in Virginia and West Virginia. Works of improvement have been approved for eight sub watersheds in Virginia and seven in West Virginia.

The local soil conservation districts sponsor this project. They are joined in some counties by county and city governments.

The principal problem is reducing flood and sediment damage to farmland and flood damage to towns, highways, and bridges. The remedial program includes conservation measures for cropland, pastures, and forests.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Santa Ynez River Watershed, California

Area: 576,000 acres
Counties: 1

This project is sponsored by the Lompoc Soil Conservation District and Santa Barbara County. It has nine sub watersheds.  Structural measures are planned for six of these. About 85 percent of the area is privately owned.

Flooding was a major problem in the Santa Ynez River area. Floodwater generally damaged houses, highways, railroads, and defense installations as well as farmland used for vegetables and flower seed production.

Land treatment measure are aimed mainly at preventing erosion and improving soil fertility on farmland and rangeland. They include terraces, drop spillways, cover crops, and farm ponds.

Structural measures, designed to protect entrenched gullies against erosion and to confine floodwater to channels, include constructing diversions, stabilizing channels, deepening stream channels, and establishing vegetation in critical areas.

Structural measures have been functioning as planned; they afford protection to farmland, houses, roads, and defense installations. Fields that formerly were subject to flooding are now used for tuck crops, and farm-to-town roads are kept open and free of water and debris.

A floodway of reinforced concrete and a debris basin provide protection for farmland in the lower part of the valley and for part of the Pacific Missile Range of the Navy.

Landowners in the watershed community have granted rights-of-way at no charge and have assumed responsibility for the maintenance of installed improvements. Many have agreed to follow a farm conservation plan that provides for the needed land treatment measures and for use of the land within its capability.

The local sponsors prepared the work plans for the sub watersheds and are responsible for constructing bridges, relocating utilities, erecting fences, and paving streets.

The Forest Service operates a fire prevention and fire control program. It helps local people build and maintain firebreaks, fire lanes, heliports, trails, and utility rights-of-way.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Trinity River Watershed, Texas

Area: 8,424,260 acres
Counties: 28

The Trinity River project has 40 sub watersheds. The principal objective is to reduce flood and sediment damage to farmland, almost all privately owned.

Land treatment measures include a program of water flow retardation and erosion control developed on a farm unit basis. Under this program, land is put to the use for which it is best suited, cropping systems are improved, and mechanical structures are installed.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Washita River Watershed, Oklahoma and Texas

Area: 5,095,040 acres
Counties: 23

The Washita River project has 60 sub watersheds. Local cooperating agencies, such as watershed associations and soil conservation districts, promote activities in each sub watershed. Guidance is furnished by the Washita Council. About 94 percent of the area is in Oklahoma and 6 percent in Texas.

The problems along the 60 tributaries include controlling erosion on the uplands and reducing flood damage on 265,000 acres of floodplain. Protection is needed on 112,000 acres along the main stem of the river.

The recommended remedial program is primarily one of land use adjustments aimed at controlling flood flows and sedimentation, conserving soil and water, and establishing permanent agriculture. Land treatment measures include improved cropping systems, proper land use, cover crops, and minor structures to increase the effectiveness of land treatment.

Structural measures include floodwater retarding structures, multipurpose reservoirs, and channel work. Severely eroded areas are stabilized either by vegetation or structures. Reservoirs store water for irrigation or municipal and industrial use or they can be used for fish and wildlife. More than 1,150 floodwater retarding structures are planned.

In the Washita River watershed about 84 percent of the farmers and ranchers have developed a soil conservation plan with their local soil conservation district, and many of the needed soil conservation practices have been applied.

Landowners bear the cost of preparing the land for deeding or sodding and for planting trees and shrubs, cultivating woodlots and shelterbelts, constructing contour furrows and ridges, erecting fences, and controlling rodents. They also pay for three-fourths of the terraces and one-half of the terrace outlets. Federal funds are now being used to cost share in treatment of critically eroding areas.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

Yazoo River Watershed, Mississippi

Area: 3,942,197
Counties: 16

The Yazoo River project has 74 sub watersheds. It is sponsored by 16 soil conservation districts and other local organizations. About 39 percent is woodland, 25 percent cropland, 20 percent pasture, and 16 percent land in miscellaneous uses. Only 7 percent or 227,975 acres is public land.

The principal objective is to reduce flood and sediment damage to farmland. Land treatment measures include conservation cropping systems; planting trees, grass, and legumes; diversion terraces; debris basins; and stabilizing road banks.

Landowners are bearing part of the cost of land treatment measures on both cultivated land and pasture. Federal and local governments are sharing the cost of erosion control practices on roads.

< Back to Flood Prevention Projects

< Back to Watersheds