|
| |
Building on a Legacy of Cooperative Conservation
Outline of remarks by Bruce I. Knight, Chief,
Natural Resources Conservation Service at the Cooperative Conservation News
Conference, U.S. Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC
February 9, 2005
Agriculture is committed to improving the health of the environment and
stewardship of our natural resources.
• The President’s budget request for 2006 continues to build on his legacy of
cooperative cooperation.
• The funding supports the President’s executive order signed last year on
Facilitation of Cooperative Conservation.
The heart of voluntary conservation programs is cooperative conservation.
Partnerships at the local, state and federal levels—with landowners, tribes,
government agencies and nongovernmental organizations—make this happen.
Cooperation and entrepreneurship -- in the workplace, on the lands, and in our
forests -- lie at the heart of environmental progress.
Some of the best conservation and environmental protections result when
landowners and communities work together.
The President wants our federal agencies to support this culture of
responsibility and to respect private landowners by being good neighbors and
good environmental partners.
Under the leadership of President Bush, federal agencies are advancing
cooperative conservation and environmental partnerships to achieve significant
results.
President’s Executive Order on Facilitation of
Cooperative Conservation
We can look forward to greater cooperation between Federal agencies on natural
resource issues, thanks to the President’s Executive Order on Facilitation of
Cooperative Conservation signed in August 2004.
• The order instructs Federal departments and agencies to enter into
conservation partnerships and to empower local participation in programs and
projects that protect and conserve natural resources and the environment.
Agencies working together under the executive order:
• Departments of the Interior,
• Department of Agriculture
• Department of Commerce,
• Department of Defense,
• Environmental Protection Agency
Emphasizes inclusion of local participation in Federal decision making.
• Promote the use, enhancement, and enjoyment of natural resources and
protection of the environment
• Collaborative activity among Federal, State, local, and tribal governments,
private for-profit and nonprofit institutions, other nongovernmental entities
and individuals.
We enjoy working with the Council on Environmental Quality to implement
cooperative conservation
We are looking forward to participating in the White House Conference on
Cooperative Conservation to be held this summer.
2006 Budget
The President’s budget for the Agriculture Department for FY 2006 supports the
direction provided in the executive order.
We will continue to implement cooperative conservation in all relevant programs.
• USDA will share the government-wide burden of controlling federal spending.
• Secretary Johanns has pledged that “USDA will be a team player in producing
savings that will strengthen the economy and reforms that will improve our
programs.”
NRCS / Partner Accomplishments in 2004
NRCS and the conservation partners had many accomplishments in FY 2004 -- with a
record investment in conservation during the year (nearly $2.8 billion),
including several new conservation programs.
NRCS partners contributed $720 million in financial and technical assistance and
equipment to these efforts.
Contributions came from Federal, State, local, and tribal
governments, soil and
water conservation districts, non-governmental organizations,
and other
sources.
• Signed nearly 48,000 EQIP contracts and more than 3,000 WHIP contracts.
• Created or restored nearly 228,000 acres of wetlands.
• Applied conservation system plans on more than 27 million acres of crop and
grazing lands.
• Closed nearly 750 WRP easements last year.
Approved the first two Wetlands Reserve Enhancement Program
projects -- one
in Nebraska and one in Minnesota.
• Helped protect more than 550 ranches and farms through the FRPP program.
• Developed and applied nearly 10,000 comprehensive nutrient management plans
(up from just over 8,000 in 2003).
• Mapped soils or updating soils maps on 28 million acres (up from 22.5 million
acres in 2003).
• Provided emergency watershed protection assistance in nearly 100 cases.
• Helped fund more than 1,700 watershed protection and flood prevention
projects.
• Our Earth Team volunteers donated nearly a million hours of their time.
Cooperative Conservation in the 2006 Budget
Conservation Reserve Program (FSA)
The 2006 budget includes $2.02 billion for the Conservation Reserve Program.
• An increase of 4.1 percent.
• CRP supports USDA’s goal of partnering with landowners to protect land, water,
and wildlife by planting grass and trees on retired agricultural land.
• $141.8 million for the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program, a
federal-state-local CRP partnership initiative that addresses specific
agricultural related environmental concerns.
• $22 million for the Farmable Wetlands Program, a CRP program that protects up
to 1 million acres of farmed and previously converted wetlands of less than 40
acres per tract.
Financial Assistance Programs (NRCS)
The budget request includes more than $1.4 billion for financial assistance
programs administered by NRCS.
This is up by more than $50 million from the President’s
proposed budget for
2005.
• The largest of these programs is EQIP, with more than $1 billion.
EQIP is the largest conservation program for private working lands.
EQIP helps farmers and ranchers improve soil, air and water quality and related
resources on private working lands.
EQIP includes Ground and Surface Water Conservation - $60 million
Increase of $9 million
Cost share and incentive payments to carry out water
conservation activities,
including irrigation improvements, conversion to less water
intensive corps, and
dryland farming.
Funding in the budget will support enrollment of an additional 25 million acres
in conservation programs, largely in EQIP.
• Other financial assistance programs are WHIP and CSP.
CSP -- $274 million.
CSP Provides financial and technical
assistant to promote conservation on
working lands.
WHIP – $60 million
Increases for financial assistance programs in 2006 budget:
• Based on 2005 current estimate, CSP is up by $72 million to
extend CSP 200
additional watersheds.
(Based on President's 2005 proposal,
CSP is up $65 million)
• $13 million for WHIP
Easement Programs (NRCS)
In addition to financial assistance programs, NRCS also administers several
programs that help landowners protect agricultural land from environmental
degradation or development. The budget includes close to $500 million for these
programs.
This is only a couple million dollars below the President’s
proposed budget for 2005.
• The largest is WRP at $321 million. (up $26 million from 2005 proposed)
WRP helps landowners restore, enhance and protect wetlands.
The program
works to maximize wildlife habitat and wetland functions and
values.
Will help landowners meet the President’s goal of restoring
or improving 3
million acres of wetlands over the next five years.
• Other easement programs are FRPP and the NRCS contribution to CRP
Conservation Technical Assistance Program (NRCS)
The budget includes $657 million for the CTA Program.
• Helps landowners plan and apply conservation on the land.
• Includes $37 million for assisting owners and operators of animal feeding
operations for comprehensive nutrient management plans.
• Includes an increase of $11 million for GLCI, targeted at invasive species.
Forest Service Programs
More than $500 million in President’s 2006 proposed budget for cooperative
conservation efforts.
Will be leveraged in partnerships and collaborative work
Will restore watersheds, reduce hazardous fuels, conduct
research, construct
trails, educate our youth, and support economies in rural
communities.
State and Private Forestry -- $253
million
• Forest Stewardship Program
- $37 million, an increase of 14.8 percent or $4.7 million from FY 2005
Provide technical and financial assistance to states to help
nonfederal
landowners manage and conserve forest resources.
• Forest Legacy Program -
$80 million, an increase of 40 percent or $23 million from FY 2005
Protect environmentally-sensitive forest areas across all
ownerships threatened
by conversion to nonforest uses.
• Urban and Community Forestry
- $27 million
Protect America's natural resources by providing technical
and financial
assistance to local governments with a nationwide emphasis on
maintaining,
restoring, and improving the livability of communities and
urban areas through
management of natural resources.
Wildland Fire Management -- $49
million
Forest health, state fire assistance and volunteer fire
assistance programs.
Other Forest Service Cooperative Conservation
Programs
• Hazardous Fuels program
-- $281 million
Maintain and restore forest and rangeland health from
catastrophic wildfire.
• Forest Inventory and Analysis program
-- $68 million
An increase of 18 percent or $13 million from FY 2005
Provide the information needed to assess America’s forest
through its annual
forest census.
• Land Acquisition program
-- $41 million
Protect critical resource areas and provide increased public
recreation
opportunities.
• Forest Products Laboratory
-- $5 million
Implement the biomass component of the Healthy Forest
Restoration Act
through grants to nonprofit and local communities.
• National Forest Foundation
-- $3 million
For use on conservation-related project grants and agreements
that incorporate
matching funds from partners.
• National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
-- $2 million
For use conservation related project grants and agreements
that incorporate
matching funds from partners.
• Challenge Cost Share agreements
-- $22 million
An increase of 2 percent or $500,000 from FY 2005)
Will generate approximately $23.5 million (an increase of 2
percent or $500,000
from FY 2005) in partner contributions for a total
contribution of $44 million.
• Forest management trust funds
-- $108 million
• Resource Advisory Committees
-- $33 million
Local community collaboration with federal land managers in
recommending
projects to be conducted on federal lands or that will
benefit resources on
federal lands.
| |
|